Skip to main content

Chicken Little & an Ersatz Courage

By October 10, 2018June 30th, 2020extremism, Good News, terrorism, The Weekly

Chicken Little & an Ersatz Courage

“Every time you take a train, step into your car, walk into the shopping mall, go to the airport- every single time, something could happen. That’s how terrorism works.” Ayaan Hirsi Ali

“Light in a messenger’s eyes brings joy to the heart, and good news gives health to the bones.” Proverbs 15:30

I would like to bring you a different kind of report this week: Good news! What if I told you that the number of terrorist attacks and terrorist-induced deaths have consistently decreased globally, over the past four years?

In this issue of “More than Meets the Eye,” we will take a look at the data that supports the notion that terrorism as we know it has actually declined over the past several years. We will discover what that means globally. We will also explore some of the reasons it is decreasing, and will examine what we can expect in the future as a result of the decline, because as usual, there is more than meets the eye.

The review.

“Terrorists are getting worse at the one thing they seek to do: terrify people.” Is that true? Are you less afraid today of a terrorist attack than you were several years ago? Do you feel safer? Do you ever contemplate the notion that the Global War on Terror has been won? The data on this matter is as confusing as ever.

On one hand, in January of 2018, 73% of U.S. adults said that defending the country against future terrorist attacks should be a top priority for President Donald Trump and Congress – making this one of the most frequently cited priorities, along with improving the educational system (72%) and strengthening the nation’s economy (71%). On the other hand: “For more than a decade after the 9/11 attacks, both the threat of terrorism and the ins-and-outs of U.S. counterterrorism policy dominated American national discourse. But not anymore. Concerns about terrorism and counterterrorism are still there to some degree, to be sure, but they’ve been elbowed aside as the primary focus of national debate and scrutiny.”

Are Western citizens less concerned about terrorism today than they were several years ago? Do they have reason to believe that things have gotten better? Let’s consider a couple of different variables.

First variable: Have terrorist attacks and deaths decreased in the world over the past few years? Second variable: Have people’s thinking about terrorism changed and could that be a factor in the decrease of at least the perception of terrorist attacks?

Let me start by reasserting my basic principle as a “terror-ologist.” The aim of terrorism is not just to kill and maim and destroy. A primary objective of terrorism is to create terror. The main goal of terrorists is to cause mayhem and fear so that peoples lives will become desperate for change, any kind of change. A terrorist will have been successful if he causes you to altar the way you live your life. Often the changes made are initiated by fear. We do not make our best decisions when we are afraid.

Variable one. Yes, there has indeed been a decrease in the recorded numbers of attacks and deaths by terrorists since 2016. The data is clear, although perhaps misleading. That is the problem with data. Clarity is most often determined by the interpreter of that data. Globally, terrorist attacks are downas are death totals. Terrorist attacks in the United Kingdom, Spain and Francehowever, are up considerably, in both severity and frequency. The encouraging news is that in many parts of the world which have been experiencing flagrant terror attacks, such as Nigeria, Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan, terroristic attacks have decreased.

Variable two. This may be the more important variable if you take seriously my definition of terrorism and terrorist attacks. Have people’s thinking about terrorism changed and could that be a factor in the decrease of at least the perception of terrorist attacks? Let me address this in four sub-points.

  1. Re-direction by main-stream media: The main stream media has been a significant player all along in the unfolding of Islamist terrorism throughout the world. I am not suggesting that they have acted in a complicit manner concerning terrorists, but it is very possible that they have been naive pawns in many ways as they have assisted in the advancement of terrorist aims and objectives. A respected terrorism specialist, Brian Jenkins made the statement: “Terrorism is theater.” If this is true, the media has magnified the goals and aims of terrorists through its sensationalist portrayals of attacks and malfeasance.
  2. Distraction by political scandals- Trump scandals have swept away the concerns of terrorism in many people, refocusing public attention on the question of campaign collusion with Russia, trade wars, chaos in the White House, nuclear North Korea, attacks against the press and such contretemps as stripping former CIA chief John Brennan of his security clearance. The media, a central player in the feedback mechanism of public opinion, redirected its energies, and today only a small fraction of terrorism stories make the front page of the dailies compared with those of a few years ago.
  3. Incompetence by terrorists- It appears to me that many are losing their respect for the lethality of terrorists. Let’s face it; many terrorist attempts have been foiled by simple failure. Here is a great article by on this matter.
  4. Indifference by the general public- “The point of terrorism is to terrify!” Many are simply becoming numb to the possibility of terrorism in 2018. This is partly due to the fact that terrorists are becoming less terrifying. There are several opinions on this, but it appears to some that it is largely due to the lack of a significant rhythm of attacks. In 2004, Russell Seitzplausibly proposed that “9/11 could join the Trojan Horse and Pearl Harbor among stratagems so uniquely surprising that their very success precludes their repetition,” that “al-Qaeda’s best shot may have been exactly that” and that, as its forces wane, the shadow the terrorist group casts looks “ever less caliphal and more quixotic.” In a nutshell, people simply do not entertain the idea that an event such as 9/11 will ever happen again. Perhaps we live under the collective delusion that we are too smart for that.

The why.

Everything in me wants to believe that the Global War on Terrorism has been won and we can all sleep in peace now. But my analytical side sees another part to this equation. There are few signs, other than some sketchy data, which indicate that the potential threat will abate anytime soon. Here are several reasons why I believe that.

  1. Nothing has been resolved- nobody’s aims and objectives have been conclusively won. There are still bad guys.There are still good guys. There is no evidence that everyone is satisfied or that their objections have been met.
  2. There are still highly motivated terrorists who are alive and well. It is much more likely that they are in an operational planning cycle and are simply looking to strategize, resource and implement their next nefarious move.
  3. Nobody in the intelligence, military or foreign affairs communities is declaring victory in this war.
  4. There are still plenty of rogue governments, organizations and individuals who are prepared to fund the next wave of terrorist attacks. History tells us that when there are an abundance of resources to commit atrocities, it is not difficult to find someone who will carry them out.

Analysis: Currently, there appears to be a pause on the operational tempo of terrorist organizations. The break can be linked to several global initiatives.

  1. ISIS is still reeling from losing 99% of its acquired territories to the Iraqi and US backed Kurdish Peshmerga. It is, in a sense licking its wounds.
  2. Al-qaeda is deeply entrenched in the form of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (Arabic for Levant Liberation Committee) in Syria. Over 10,000 of their fighters are tied up in Idlib, Syria. (See the last three issues of MTMTE.)
  3. Much of the terrorism empowered by ISIS is of the lone-wolf type, which has simply not been effective. It is largely this form of violent extremism that has caused many to disregard terrorism altogether.

It is only fair to say as a reminder, that being killed by a foreign terrorist in the US, statistically, is very unlikely; some analysts will tell us it is a 1 in 20 millionchance. Of course, it becomes very existential if you or one of your family members is that “1 in 20 million.”

The action.

We live in a world where we regularly calculate our vulnerabilities. We have learned to measure our safety. We have developed ways of coping with threats. We evaluate threats by three premises: how well we minimize our risks, maximize our defenses and maintain our spirits.

We minimize risks by gaining information and by making decisions based on our understanding of the situations surrounding us. Each of us has a different tolerance level for risk. The more situationally aware we remain, the better decisions we will make as we seek to reduce our risks. Maximizing our defenses entails preparing forays into our environment. We lock our doors, use electronic security devices, buy weapons, train in defensive arts, form neighborhood watch groups etc.

Lastly, we maintain our spirit. We understand God’s Word and act consistently based on it. We love at all times, serve at all times, give at all times. We do not place our confidence in ourselves, but in the Holy Spirit as we depend on him to guide us through these turbulent times.

In our country, we have traded much of our safety and security for convenience. We need always to remember though, that sometimes there are monsters under our beds.


Michael Becker (2017) Why Violence Abates: Imposed and Elective Declines in Terrorist Attacks, Terrorism and Political Violence, 29:2, 215-235, DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2015.1011799

© 2019 • More Than Meets